Sorry, but I don’t believe the nursery fire story. Meghan Markle’s podcast, Archetypes, has finally dropped. No, I did not listen to it. Nor do I want to. Meghan’s voice irritates me. Anyway, the reason I’m writing this at all is due to the story that has come out of the podcast. I strongly agree with the new victim narrative the Princess of Montecito has chosen to spin. So, she spewed a story about a nursery fire in South Africa when Archie was under five months old.
No One Believes The Nursery Fire Story
When this came out last night, I was like, yeah, this didn’t happen. Mind you, I was dead tired when I saw it. However, my opinion hasn’t changed and here’s why. I have a series of questions that I know will never be answered. So, if I were to confront Meghan, I would ask:
- Where’s your proof?
- Why are we hearing about this now?
- Would the nanny back it up?
- Where is the nanny now?
- Is the nanny still employed with the Sussexes?
- Why was a heater on in a nursery when it was super hot at that time of year?
- Why wasn’t the fire brigade called?
Heat And Cot Death Information
Also, I want to say that according to what Meghan says, the nanny and Archie were nowhere near the room when the nursery fire allegedly happened. Moreover, Meghan’s Mole points out that the weather is scorching in September in South Africa, so why would you need a heater? I saw earlier that heat is allegedly a leading contributing factor to cot death.
I did a quick search and found an article by the NIH (National Institutes of Health) in America, which discusses how babies cannot regulate body temperature very well. So it goes to say that while it’s OK to keep an infant warm when it is cold, overlaying with excess blankets, etc., is dangerous. Also, it says that the cold can increase the chance of SIDs (cot death), as does excess heat.
Only Caring About Herself
So, moving on from the nursery fire crap, I wanted to go over to the other cringe-fest we got with how Meghan and her “loyal” best friend Serena Williams patted each other on the back about their ambition. Before I continue here, the DuchAss of Monteshitshow mentions in her video that if something traumatic had happened, Meghan and Harry would not have left Archie. She even talks about an incident when her eldest son was a baby when how she became paranoid that if she left him,
I want to bring something else up here. Meghan only cares about herself and branding the royals as cruel. We know this, but why did she parade South Africa afterwards? This was the same trip where she told Tom Bradby that no one asked if she was OK after having Archie.
Since When Is Women Having Ambitions Bad?
Going back to the ambition discussion, I get where Serena is coming from, as she had to fight her way to the top of the tennis world. As did her sister, Venus. They even allowed Will Smith to play their dad in King Richard. Her career spanned twenty years, so why is Meghan comparing her 72 days as a working royal to her so-called best friend’s long career?
The majority of the world doesn’t look down on ambitious women. Some industries do. Sport is a big one, and I can see how Serena struggled. Meghan has had this problem as everything was handed to her. Either that, or she paid for people to say “yes” to her and compliment her on everything she does as “groundbreaking.”
There Is Nothing Groundbreaking About Archetypes
The description for Archetypes says it’s groundbreaking. Yeah, it’s not. Also, the blurb is poorly written. The screenshot is taken from the Spotify website on the Archetypes page. I won’t link it as I don’t want to contribute to views or traffic any more than I already have.
Though I have seen on Twitter that someone posted a screenshot of the Spotify app, the text doesn’t look like it does here. Also, the description seems like a 12-year-old wrote it.
When the podcast was announced, it didn’t surprise me that this was what Meghan would do. I mentioned in another post that she believes she came up with the word ‘Archetypes’ as it is a play on (in her mind) “Archewell” and stereotypes.” She still doesn’t understand that the word has existed for 500 years. Also, it doesn’t mean what she thinks it does. She believes that it is “on brand” because it starts with “Arche.”
Yes, there are sexist people worldwide, but it doesn’t mean that stereotypes about women aren’t discussed. Meghan is not the first woman to talk about women-based stereotypes, though she thinks she’s saving the female populace.
Is Meghan Trying To Conceal A Lie From Harry?
So, going back to the supposed nursery fire, someone mentioned in a video this morning that I watched that Harry had a brief cameo. But, I think it was in the DuchAss of Monteshitshow’s video that the story about the nursery fire came after he had left. So, could it be possible that Meghan had come up with this lie but chose not to mention it until Harry had left?
It is entirely feasible. Also, myself and other Megxiteers have said that Meghan is setting Harry up for a fall. After the fiasco that was Harry’s Mandala Day speech where the UN was empty sans a few people, Meghan could get people to fill the seats in Manchester in a few weeks. She wants to be seen as the popular one, but the seat filler story has been advertised. I have no doubts that the British members of the Sussex Squad will be paid to show up. A report in the Daily Mail from a couple of days ago states that tickets for the One Young World conference will cost £1000 per day. If the Squaddies are desperate enough, they’ll show up and scream, “Yeah! Princess Meghan!” You know, their regular gobblygook that they sprout.
Could it be possible that Harry might’ve debunked the nursery story. Entirely possible.
