Entitled, privileged, and whatever else, the Sussexes are still being exposed – We’ve heard the stories of the debacle of whether or not Thomas Markle would walk his daughter down the aisle. A new story has come out regarding Prince Charles walking Meghan down the aisle. Brittany of the Royal News Network writes that the now-California-based Duchess of Sussex didn’t want her father-in-law to walk her all the way. Allegedly, she said, “Can you meet me halfway?” Umm. Entitled much?
Who the HELL asks this, especially since the person walking you will be monarch someday? The selfishness of Meghan’s (alleged) statement shows she is not the feminist that she claims to be. Let’s think of the reasons why she would ask to meet Charles halfway down the aisle.
- To show she is an independent woman when she’s not.
- To use the situation as a shield to claim she was not supported.
- Get to cry to Harry and claim that no one wanted to walk her after Thomas pulled out.
Constructively, these are just a couple of points. What’s more, is that having the future King of England walk her down the aisle, even partway wasn’t good enough. What would’ve been? Having her father there was no good as “he wasn’t famous enough.” We wholeheartedly believe that Thomas was never invited.
Meghan did something smart here. She didn’t invite any member of her family except her mother, as she knew people from her past would talk. One example would be her half-brother, Thomas Jr, who wrote a letter to Harry, saying she would ruin his life. Sadly, he was correct.
The Victimhood Narrative
Okay, we know now that Meghan cut all her family out of her life, even the Ragland family. Outside of Markle being a grade-A narcissist, we need to examine the reason why she would abandon people who have done nothing but support her.
When you look back on what has been said, such as Harry’s comment during the engagement interview. This is the one where he claimed his family would be “like the family Meghan never had.” He even spoke of their support and how William and Catherine were “dying” to meet her. Now, this sounds like the true Harry. Not the woke messiah he’s become. He was excited that he had found “the one.” However, Meghan’s reactions seem to suggest other intentions.
As time goes on, Harry’s personality isn’t the same. His paranoia over invisible paparazzi existed pre-Meghan and her entitled ways. According to the Express’ Abbie Llewelyn, the Duke of Sussex’s ex-girlfriend, Cressida Bonas (allegedly), told some of her friends that the prince had a neurosis surrounding the press. Moreover, this is part of his “the press is trying to kill my family” garbage he is constantly spouting. Oh, and apparently Harry believes living a privileged life is neglectful.
What Arthur Edwards Has Said
Arthur Edwards, a well-known royal photographer with over 40 years of experience, spoke about the Sussexes. According to Olivia Stringer, Rachel Hagan, and Astha Saxena’s Express article, the photographer has said that all the other royals are friendly and say hello. Harry used to be like this but changed when entitled Meghan came on the scene. When he worked with them, he claims it was “depressing” and “miserable.”
Hmm. Furthermore, this is interesting because we all know how much Meghan loves being on camera. She has stared down the barrel of a telephoto lens in Canada, for god’s sake. Oh, and then she sewed the paps when it’s evident she set the pap walk up in the first place.
We believe Arthur when he says that the Sussexes were a nightmare. What’s more, is he also says that he didn’t go on the Australia Tour because of how he got treated. Good on him for speaking out about his experience. We’ve seen a video of him from a while back talking about this, and he doesn’t mince words.
