The patriarchy is under threat from Meghan Markle. NOT! – Okay, can someone please enlighten me? Why does Meghan Markle, a former actress and a consistent whiner, want to take down the patriarchy? She realises that women cannot exist without men, doesn’t she? While I believe that the opposite sex has exploited their position for far too long, I do not wish to see them blasted.
Meghan is not a trailblazer, and she has never been. She named her blog after a wine few people had heard about. Also, all the Tig Talk posts were with famous people. She has no idea how to relate to everyday people. She would not be using her adopted title to get ahead in life if she did. Though, what else can we expect from a narcissist?
One thing has bothered me about her whole ‘Archetypes’ podcast thing was announced. It has nothing to do with how she thought she was creating a portmanteau. Arche (taken from Archewell) + types (from Stereotypes) is as lame as it sounds. Also, the definition of ‘Archetype’ doesn’t match what Meghan believes it means. Doesn’t she know how to use a dictionary?
Archetypes v. Stereotypes
The associated screenshot was taken from the dictionary app on my laptop. As you can see, the word ‘Archetype’ has no link to stereotypes. Below is the definition of ‘stereotype’.
Meghan’s attempt to take down the patriarchy laughable is because she believes she is the woman who will succeed in her quest. She won’t. No female in the history of the world will ever be able to achieve this.
My dear friend Sue Smith mentioned in her recent video that women are achieving so much in the world. There are many female-run companies, women film directors, writers, etc. Unfortunately, Meghan is not adding to the conversation. Pointing out the corruption of the patriarchy via stereotypes most people already know about isn’t contributing anything. Spotify likely only took this on as she has nothing of value that wasn’t deemed a vanity project which pushed her profile into glorified saint status.
Meghan’s attempt to stamp out the patriarchy has me wondering why she got married and has a son if she hates men? Why did she credit her father on the Tig if she felt this way?
Honestly, it doesn’t matter as Meghan will only come up with an excuse as she always does. Anyway, I also wanted to explain why she social climb using men if she thinks the patriarchy needs to die?
That will never be fully explained; I don’t believe.
Why Get Married If You Despise The Patriarchy?
Meghan is supposed to be a voice of female empowerment. So, if she hates the patriarchy, why did she get married? I’m not just saying to Harry but Trevor too. Now, I’m not including her alleged husband before the film producer, as there is virtually no evidence to support this. If there were, I would’ve found some trace of it. There are no records that I can find that say she was married before Engelson.
Anyway, that’s not why we’re here.
The patriarchy and the matriarchy have existed for the same length of time. Ultimately, we’re not about to turn the world into an Amazon-like society. If it were, men would be used for reproduction and are then killed.
In conclusion, this hopefully isn’t what Meghan thinks of the male populace. However, if she does, it would mean she is sexist with the inability to hide it. Moreover, it’d back up what people have said about her antics. Finally, I covered this in the rumour regarding Tyler Perry’s staff.
