Meghan Markle believes she is the world’s most excellent writer. Let’s ignore all the great storytellers of our time, shall we? William Shakespeare. Homer. Hans Christian Andersen. Emily Dickinson. Mary Shelley. Plato. These are just a handful of the writers who have shaped literature over the centuries—their period defines what a word means. It’s called a definition.
However, in the twenty-first century, Meghan Markle believes she is changing how people see the world. Here’s the thing, Megsy. You’re not essential, and the giant planet doesn’t care. You don’t have millions of followers at your beck and call. So, what gives you the right to attempt to change what certain words mean?
Upon the decision of the US Supreme Court to scrap Roe v. Wade, Meghan described her “feminist” husband, Prince Harry’s reaction as being “guttural.” Umm. It doesn’t mean what she thinks it does. This is the definition from my laptop’s dictionary app says:
Words look good in a sentence, but you must understand the definition to make complete sense. Also, there is a couple of incidences that the Sussexes don’t appear to grasp. The first one was Harry’s ad with actor Rhys Darby for his company Travalyst. If you’re desperate to watch him make a fool of himself, click the link. In the video, the prince is wearing a t-shirt with the phrase GirlDad.
Now, this is not a bad thing. However, what he and Meghan don’t understand is the definition of GirlDad. The term is used for fathers with only daughters. Meanwhile, Harry has a boy and a girl. Therefore, he does not qualify for GirlDad status.
One example of a celebrity who does is actor and former wrestler Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, who has three daughters. Also, he has no sons. Moreover, another example of a GirlDad is Harry’s cousin, Peter Phillips, who has two daughters. He, too, has no sons.
A different example is any guy whose only child is a daughter. I doubt Harry would’ve heard of the term if it weren’t for Meghan. Now, I don’t have a problem with the term. I believe it is a breakout term to define the relationships between the female populace and their fathers if they have them. GirlDad also breaks the stereotype of men always wanting sons.
Furthermore, Meghan’s incorrect usage of words is no different to her definition of racism. Also, her claim that Harry is a feminist doesn’t mean she’s fighting the patriarchy. Moreover, Harry is slowly losing his mind as his wife’s woke ideals corrupt his mind. Also, she is not much of a feminist due to her jealousy of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.
A true feminist would embrace other women and not show contempt. Moreover, Tom Bower’s book, Revenge, unleashed the truth behind Meghan’s constant envy of women. These ladies were often more successful. So, it’s sad to think that she tried to attach herself to others to achieve a boost in status. Moreover, not even her so-called celebrity friends could get her children’s book The Bench onto the bestseller list the way Catherine’s book, Hold Still, did on the first day of its release.
Meghan had to buy almost every unsold copy herself to get it somewhere. Honestly, it should be disqualified from getting onto any list if the author buys all the copies. I remember at Christmastime last year; I walked into the picture book section of a Big W store, and The Bench was sitting on the bottom shelf untouched. The next time I checked, they were gone or moved. So, does that mean that Meghan bought all those copies too?
Whatever the case, it doesn’t matter. She’s a terrible writer. There was even a child reviewer who said that the book was boring. But she gave credit where it was due. She said that Meghan was pretty and that Archie was cute. An adult reviewer for Newstateman said that Meghan is on every page. The book is told from her perspective. Unfortunately, they also called the book overall bad.
Meghan also doesn’t understand a father and son relationship or any child’s relationship with her father as she dumped her dad. Also, she has prohibited her husband from having any form of relationship with his own father. Oh, and the cringe dedication she put in the book’s opening pages is scary. I’m surprised that Tyler Perry didn’t rave about the book as he is #TeamSussex. I think he has a copy of the book for his son. I’m not 100% sure.
The Bench is a slap in the face to anyone who is not rich and wants to publish a book. Meghan threw buckets of money at Penguin Random House to publish the book. I’m surprised they didn’t call out her own and say that her grammar was terrible. Whoever approved of the editing of The Bench deserves to be fired. I’ve seen pages from the book, which aren’t very good.
There is no story in the book. Kids want a story, not some nonsense about what defines a father and son’s bond. I doubt Archie loves the book. His mother might write it, but he doesn’t understand what it’s about. He’s three years old. I doubt he’s even been around other children outside the celebrity kids.
In conclusion, Meghan McCain should challenge Meghan to a debate. Now, I would watch that. Furthermore, it would be Meghan v. Meghan.
