So, I’ve been doing some thinking about two things. The first is why are Harry and Meghan hiding their children? Topic two is a detail that I think people seem to have missed in the 40×40 Initiative video that makes it evident that the whole thing was staged. Now, I think I covered the entire hiding of the kids before. Except, I can’t find just one I did as it was in minor detail in so many of them. Anyway, what exactly are the Sussexes getting at when it comes to their money-making schemes? They don’t seem to grasp that they must work to keep the cash flowing.
Also, people are growing tired of their lies. The more they throw barbs at the royal family and the more lies they tell, the less the public wants to associate with them. However, some will side with them. Look at the friends who have done on national television (in America) to say that Meghan and Have have ‘receipts of the abuse’ they have supposedly gotten from the BRF. If they did have evidence, why have they not produced anything yet? A 30-page dossier will be a one-sided bias to make them look like victims. Everything they present will be twisted to their truth.
Going to the whole reason I’m doing this post, I think it’s strange that they talk about having children, but we don’t see them. I understand they want to keep Archie and Lili’s privacy intact, but they’re not celebrities. They’re royals. I also wanted to go over a detail I noticed that proves the 40×40 thing Meghan is doing is a total fake. Staged as a massive PR stunt.
Not Celebrities
Okay, so I have no issues with celebrities keeping their children away from the spotlight. However, the kids of said celebrities didn’t ask to be born to famous relatives. I suspect this was what Golden Age Hollywood actor Gregory Peck wanted for his grandchildren. According to his grandson, Ethan, he had no idea his grandfather was an actor as he was growing up. He was ‘grandpa’.
Celebrities always put photos of their children up on Instagram but have their faces covered by emojis or blurred out. I know Bitsie Tulloch does it with her daughter. At least we know her child exists. However, with the Sussexes, they believe they’re celebrities when they’re nothing more than grifters who only want money to fund their million, no wait billionaire-to-be lifestyle.
Meghan wasn’t much of an actor, so she was never cast in anything huge. As a result, most people didn’t know who she was. Also, very few people watched Suits because it was on a cable network, and not many people knew about her lifestyle blog, The Tig.
Harry, meanwhile, only has his title as a prince to go off. He is also the youngest son of one of the most photographed women in the 80s and 90s; Princess Diana. Not to mention, he is not the sharpest tool in the shed. He had to have his Eton College teachers cheat for him to get into the Sandhurst Military Academy.
Being royalty is very different from being a celebrity. The Sussexes believe they can be both when it doesn’t work that way. They slam the royals but still carry foreign titles. They commercialise these because they have nothing else to offer the big CEOs.
Where Are Archie And Lili?
What I talk about next with the Sussex kids, I don’t personally believe. This is what other people say online. So, do I think they exist? I believe Archie exists. Why would Prince Charles pose with Harry and a grandchild who is not his in a christening photo? There have been claims that Archie is not Harry and Meghan’s child. A journalist in the US with a son who looks remarkably like ‘Archie’. Also, most of the photos we have of ‘Archie’ are seldom of his face. There’s always been an eye, a hand, a foot, or from a distance. But then, the latest one we’ve gotten is off his back.
Lili is a different matter. There are no photos and there’s evidence pointing to no ‘Lilibeth Diana Mountbatten-Windsor’ being born in Santa Barbara. However, a Diana Mary Mountbatten-Windsor’ that was born in Los Angeles on the same date ‘Lilibet’ was supposed to be. I wrote about this a while back.
Now, if Lili isn’t real, why would Harry and Meghan cover this up? Also, the ‘birth certificate’ that was released is fake. I say it is a staged document because you cannot use a title as a first or last name in America. However, after a thorough search, I cannot find information to support this. However, I did find on the ABA (American Bar Association) website which says the parents of a child have to list their names.
Above, you can see the ‘staged’ birth certificate. You’ll notice that Meghan and Harry have changed how their names are presented. On Archie’s birth certificate Meghan was listed with her title. However, on Lili’s, she isn’t. With Harry, his name and title were listed on his son’s. On his daughter’s, only his title is listed.
The Cambridge Children Aren’t Hidden And Are More Important Than Their Sussex Cousins
The world loves Prince William and Catherine because they’ve included their children in their work when necessary. They also provide regular updates in exchange for keeping the press at bay. Also, it has become a tradition that the Duchess of Cambridge takes personal photos, and she and William release their favourites on the children’s birthdays or at Christmas.
This is fair, and not to mention, nothing is ever staged with the Cambridges. All of the photos Catherine takes are very authentic and in the moment. Professional photographers have praised her, as per the Express. George, Charlotte, and Louis are more important to the monarchy than Archie and Lili, so why are the Sussex kids hidden away?
Harry and Meghan are paranoid. I wrote a while ago about why they need so much security. In my eyes, Harry is paranoid about privacy for his children because he doesn’t want them being ‘killed’ by the press the way he thinks his mother was. Also, I do not doubt that Markle has been breathing down his neck that she could die like his mum, and if he doesn’t do what she tells him to do, she’ll divorce him and take the kids with her.
Staged 40×40 video
Finally, we reach the end of this post with my view on a particular aspect of Meghan’s 40×40 video. Look at the image of Meghan above. Behind her, on the right side of the frame, you’ll see a set of legs. I think this is a tripod for a light. Now, it’s an odd place to place it. Also, it’s not like the room needs lighting. There’s a ton of natural light filtering through the windows. It may even be a camera tripod, but it’s more likely for a light. It might even be a prop light that Meghan can merch, but if it were a prop, then we would’ve seen the whole thing. Not just some of it.
Also, it’s very unprofessional for the people filming the video to leave the tripod in plain sight. From the perspective of someone who has been on a filming location, stuff-ups happen. I get it. But Meghan grew up on television sets with her dad, who was a lighting director.
Whether this was intentional is anyone’s guess.
